top of page

Graphical Forecasts for Aviation (GFA): How to Use the Interactive Map for Smarter Preflight and En-route Decisions

If you’ve ever wished you could “see the forecast” the same way you see radar—layered, zoomable, time-stepped, and altitude-aware—that’s exactly what Graphical Forecasts for Aviation (GFA) is designed to do.


GFA is an interactive aviation weather map produced by the National Weather Service’s Aviation Weather Center. It’s intended to give pilots and dispatchers a complete, map-based picture of weather that may impact flight, combining observations, forecasts, and warnings in one interface.


This post breaks down what GFA is, what it includes, how to read it efficiently, and how to avoid the common traps that lead to bad decisions.



Study this full length lesson (video, podcast, flashcards, and quiz) here: Full Length Lesson >


What is GFA?

GFA is a map-based tool that brings together:

  • Observations (what’s happening now and recently)

  • Forecast grids (what’s expected and where)

  • Advisories/warnings (what’s hazardous and operationally significant)


It’s designed primarily for the United States (including Alaska and Hawaii) and surrounding regions (including parts of the Gulf, Caribbean, Atlantic, and Pacific), with the ability to view weather in the recent past and step forward into the near future.


Translation: GFA is a single place to answer, “What’s the weather doing along my route, at my altitude, at my time?”


Why pilots care: GFA is a modern “big picture” briefing tool

For decades, pilots relied heavily on text-based regional forecasts for en-route context away from airports. Industry trends have shifted toward more graphical, digital aviation weather products that can display hazards, ceilings/visibilities, winds, and other factors in a way that is easier to interpret spatially.


GFA fits that mission: it helps you rapidly identify:

  • Where conditions are likely to be IFR/MVFR/VFR

  • Where convective weather or widespread precipitation may affect routing

  • Where icing/turbulence/winds are likely at different altitudes

  • How these hazards evolve through your departure–en route–arrival time window


What you can see in GFA

While specific layer names and availability can evolve, GFA commonly includes:


1) Operational impact layers (what affects your go/no-go)

  • Flight category (VFR/MVFR/IFR/LIFR)

  • Clouds (coverage and base/top information in various formats)

  • Visibility/ceiling-style analyses (depending on mode/layer)

  • Precipitation (type/coverage/intensity depending on the product)


2) Hazard layers (what can bite you en route)

  • Thunderstorms/convective depiction

  • Icing

  • Turbulence

  • Surface or upper winds


3) Advisory and warning overlays (what requires special attention)

Depending on the configuration and region, the tool can show overlays such as:

  • SIGMETs

  • Center Weather Advisories (CWAs)

  • Relevant watches/warnings


4) Observational overlays (what’s happening now)

GFA often allows observational layers such as:

  • METAR plots

  • Radar imagery

  • Satellite imagery

  • Lightning

  • PIREPs

  • Fronts and other analysis products


This “forecast + observations + advisories” combo is one of the biggest advantages of GFA: it lets you check whether the forecast story matches what’s unfolding.


The core idea: GFA is driven by three questions

To use GFA efficiently, always think in this loop:


1) When? (Time)

You can step through time—both recent history and forecast hours—to see how conditions evolve. This is crucial for timing-dependent hazards like convection, fog/low stratus, and winter weather bands.


2) At what altitude?

For winds, icing, and turbulence especially, altitude matters as much as location. GFA typically provides multiple altitude levels so you can evaluate:

  • A smooth altitude “lane” versus a rough one

  • A cold, icy layer versus a warmer, safer layer

  • Tailwind/headwind tradeoffs versus fuel and comfort


3) What story? (Layers)

Turn on layers that answer your current decision:

  • “Can I safely go?” → hazards + flight category

  • “Where should I route?” → precip/convective + ceilings/visibilities

  • “What altitude should I choose?” → winds + turbulence + icing


One of the best features: route tools and cross sections

One of the most practical ways to use GFA is to draw or define a route, then use a cross-section-style view (where available) to visualize conditions along the route by altitude.


This is especially powerful for:

  • Icing: seeing where the icing layer sits vertically and geographically

  • Turbulence: identifying smoother altitude bands and where roughness clusters

  • Cloud structure: understanding where you’ll be in/out of cloud and how tops evolve


Instead of guessing “maybe 8,000 will be okay,” a cross-section view helps you confirm whether 8,000 stays okay for the whole trip.


A pilot-friendly workflow: use GFA in five passes

Here’s a simple routine that matches real-world decision making.


Pass 1: Big hazards first

Turn on convective/hazard layers and advisory overlays. Ask:

  • Are there thunderstorms or widespread hazards on/near the route?

  • Are there active advisories that suggest reroutes or delays?


Pass 2: Flight category reality check

Add flight category and cloud/visibility layers near:

  • Departure airport and immediate climb-out area

  • Destination terminal area

  • Alternates along the route


This quickly reveals whether the route is mostly VFR, marginal, or leaning IFR, and where the “trouble pockets” are.


Pass 3: Altitude strategy

Now pick your likely cruising altitude range and step through:

  • Winds (performance, groundspeed, fuel)

  • Turbulence (ride quality and safety)

  • Icing (risk management, equipment limits)


Do not treat these as “one-and-done.” Step a few levels up and down and compare. Often the safest or smoothest choice is just a few thousand feet away.


Pass 4: Time evolution

Move the time slider through your expected window:

  • At departure time

  • Mid-route time

  • Arrival time

  • “What if we’re an hour late?”


This is where you catch traps like: “Looks fine now… but the convective line arrives at my destination two hours before I do.”


Pass 5: Observations to validate

Turn on observational layers to ground-truth the plan:

  • Radar and lightning for convection

  • METARs for ceilings/visibilities

  • PIREPs for icing and turbulence confirmation


If observations disagree sharply with forecast depictions, treat that as a cue to be more conservative and seek additional briefing.


Interpreting icing and turbulence intelligently

Icing: forecast environment vs what pilots report

Forecast icing layers depict the atmosphere’s support for icing conditions; PIREPs describe what a pilot experienced in a specific aircraft, with specific speed, exposure, and deice/anti-ice capability. Both are valuable, but they answer different questions.


Practical technique:

  • Use the icing forecast to identify “where icing is likely to exist.”

  • Use PIREPs to learn “how bad it is in practice” and at what altitudes pilots are finding relief.


Turbulence: treat it like terrain

Turbulence is structured and altitude-dependent. You can have a smooth ride at one level and a rough ride 2,000 feet above. Instead of thinking “turbulence yes/no,” think:

  • Where is the rough zone?

  • How thick is it vertically?

  • Is there a smoother layer above or below?

  • Does it strengthen with time?


What GFA is not (important limitations)

1) It’s not a continuous movie

GFA displays time steps—snapshots. Conditions can change between steps, especially in fast-moving convective scenarios. Step through time and look for consistent trends rather than relying on a single frame.


2) It’s not perfect at micro-scale

Shallow fog, valley stratus, lake-effect bands, and storm outflow boundaries can evolve faster and smaller than any broad gridded depiction. Use observations and local knowledge.


3) It doesn’t replace airport-specific detail

GFA is excellent for big-picture decisions, but you still need airport-level details for:

  • Actual vs forecast ceilings/visibility

  • Approach minimums

  • Winds and runway configuration impacts

  • NOTAMs and operational constraints


Use GFA as your “regional brain,” then zoom into endpoint specifics as a separate check.


Common mistakes (and easy fixes)

  • Mistake: Staying at one altitude.

    • Fix: Step multiple altitudes for winds/icing/turbulence and compare.

  • Mistake: Looking at only one time.

    • Fix: Slide through your departure-to-arrival window plus a delay scenario.

  • Mistake: Trusting the forecast without checking reality.

    • Fix: Turn on METARs, radar/lightning, and PIREPs to validate.

  • Mistake: Ignoring route-based views.

    • Fix: Use route tools and cross-sections to see vertical structure along the whole trip.


A “stealable” GFA checklist for your preflight

  1. Hazards: convection + advisories

  2. Operational minima: flight category + clouds/vis near endpoints/alternates

  3. Altitude: winds + turbulence + icing by level

  4. Time: step through the full flight window and “+1 hour late”

  5. Validate: observations (METARs/radar/lightning/PIREPs)



Study Full Aviation Courses:

wifiCFI's full suite of aviation courses has everything you need to go from brand new to flight instructor and airline pilot! Check out any of the courses below for free:


Study Courses:


Checkride Lesson Plans:


Teaching Courses:



 
 
bottom of page