top of page

MSAs on Approach Plates: What They Are, What They Aren’t, and How to Use Them IFR

If you’ve spent any time flying IFR, you’ve probably glanced at the MSA circle on an instrument approach chart and thought, “Cool—this is my safe altitude.” That’s… mostly the right instinct, but MSAs have some important nuances that can bite you if you treat them like a get-out-of-jail-free card.


Let’s break down Minimum Sector Altitudes (MSAs) the way they actually show up in real-world IFR flying—especially when you’re heads-down, busy, and trying to stay ahead of the airplane.



Study this full length lesson (video, podcast, flashcards, and quiz) here: Full Length Lesson >


What an MSA really is

An MSA is a charted altitude that provides obstacle clearance within a defined area around a navigation facility or fix associated with the approach.


In plain pilot language:

  • It’s a “worst-case” safe altitude for that sector.

  • It’s intended for emergency use (lost, off-route, comm failure, “where am I?” moments) and for situational awareness.

  • It’s not a step in the procedure and not an ATC clearance.


Most MSAs are built to provide at least 1,000 feet obstacle clearance (and typically 2,000 feet in mountainous areas) within the depicted sector, but the key is: the MSA is only guaranteed inside the area it defines.


Where you find it on an approach plate

On many U.S.-style government and Jepp charts, you’ll see the MSA as:

  • A circle centered on a VOR/VORTAC, NDB, LOC, or a fix.

  • “Pie slices” (sectors) with bearings and altitudes.

  • A note about the radius—often 25 NM (sometimes 30 NM on some formats).


If the approach is RNAV-only, the MSA may be referenced to the IAF or a named fix instead of a ground-based navaid.


The most important limitation: MSA is not ATC’s problem

Here’s the trap: MSA is not a substitute for the published procedure or for an assigned altitude.

  • If ATC says “maintain 5,000,” you can’t climb to the MSA just because it’s higher.

  • If you’re cleared for the approach, you still need to comply with published altitude constraints and step-down fixes, not the MSA.


Think of MSA like a parachute altimeter: it’s there if things go sideways, not as your normal plan.


MSA vs. other “minimum” altitudes (don’t mix these up)

A lot of IFR confusion comes from putting all “minimum altitudes” in the same mental bucket. They’re not interchangeable:


MSA (Minimum Sector Altitude)

  • Obstacle clearance inside a sector/radius.

  • For emergency/situational awareness.

  • Not used by ATC for separation.


MEA / MOCA / OROCA (Enroute)

  • Enroute structure and nav signal reception (MEA), obstacle only (MOCA), or charted off-route obstacle clearance (OROCA).

  • Used for route planning and IFR cruising.


MVA (Minimum Vectoring Altitude)

  • ATC’s internal “you won’t hit anything” altitude for vectors.

  • Not typically shown on your chart (some locations publish them, but don’t count on it).


How MSAs relate to approach planning

1) Briefing anchor

When you brief an approach, the MSA gives you an instant sense of the terrain environment.

  • If the MSA is 9,700 in one sector and 3,600 in another, you already know which side of the airport you don’t want to casually drift toward while troubleshooting.


2) “What if I need to go missed early?”

Missed approaches protect you only if you fly them as published (or as assigned). If you have to stop the approach early—engine issue, icing, unstable—MSA can help you decide a “safe-up” direction and altitude after you’re established in a protected area or when you’re sure you’re within the sector.


3) Situational awareness during vectors

When you’re getting radar vectors to final, you might not have the full procedure loaded mentally (or you’re transitioning late). MSAs can be a quick “sanity check” for terrain clearance if you know you’re inside the radius/sector.


When MSAs are genuinely useful in the cockpit

Lost (or uncertain position)

If you’re not sure exactly where you are but you can identify you’re within a particular sector (or you’re confident you’re within 25 NM of the reference navaid/fix), an MSA can be a fast move toward safety.


Comms failure

If you’re sorting out a radio failure and need an immediate “safe altitude” while you transition to the published comm-failure plan, the MSA can be part of your decision-making.


Automation “surprise”

Ever had the box sequence the wrong leg, or the autopilot start a turn you weren’t expecting? If you’re suddenly not comfortable with where the airplane is headed, MSA can inform whether you should prioritize “climb now” or “turn now.”


Common mistakes pilots make with MSAs

Mistake #1: Assuming MSA guarantees clearance everywhere near the airport

It doesn’t. The MSA only applies:

  • within the depicted radius and

  • inside the correct sector relative to the reference point.


Outside that? It’s just a number on paper.


Mistake #2: Treating MSA like a “minimum descent altitude”

MSA is about obstacle clearance, not approach geometry, not descent planning, and not stable path management. You can be above MSA and still be wildly out of position for the approach.


Mistake #3: Not verifying what the MSA is centered on

Sometimes it’s the VOR on the field, sometimes a nearby facility, sometimes a fix. If you assume it’s centered on the airport and it isn’t, you can be wrong by a lot.


Mistake #4: Using MSA as if it includes route/turn protection

It doesn’t guarantee you’re protected while maneuvering the way the procedure turn or hold-in-lieu does. It’s “obstacle clearance in a bucket,” not “protected airspace for creative flying.”


Practical technique: how to use MSA without overtrusting it

Here’s a simple cockpit habit that works:

  1. Identify the MSA reference (navaid/fix).

  2. Note the radius (often 25 NM).

  3. Call out the highest sector during the brief (“Highest sector MSA is…”)

  4. Use it as a decision tool, not a clearance.


A good mental script:

  • “If we get disoriented or lose comms inside 25 NM, climb to the sector MSA while we sort it out—then transition back to the published procedure or comm-failure plan.”


A final reality check: MSA is not your primary terrain solution

MSAs are helpful, but your best terrain safety stack IFR is still:

  • Flying published altitudes (especially on arrivals and approaches)

  • Respecting ATC minimums (vectors/altitudes)

  • TAWS/terrain display (if equipped) and smart mode use

  • Knowing the high terrain side of the airport before you go IMC


MSA is a great backup, and a great briefing cue. Just don’t promote it to “primary plan” unless the situation truly calls for it.



Study Full Aviation Courses:

wifiCFI's full suite of aviation courses has everything you need to go from brand new to flight instructor and airline pilot! Check out any of the courses below for free:


Study Courses:


Checkride Lesson Plans:


Teaching Courses:



 
 
bottom of page