top of page

SDF Instrument Approaches: The “Localizer-Like” Procedure You Still Need to Understand

An SDF—Simplified Directional Facility—is one of those instrument approach terms that can feel like a relic, until you’re flying into a smaller airport in marginal weather and the only non-RNAV option on the plate says SDF RWY XX.


SDF approaches aren’t common everywhere, but they’re absolutely worth understanding because they combine localizer-style lateral guidance with non precision vertical procedures—and they come with a few traps if you assume they behave exactly like an ILS or a standard localizer approach.



Study this full length lesson (video, podcast, flashcards, and quiz) here: Full Length Lesson >


What an SDF Is (and What It Isn’t)

An SDF is a ground-based lateral guidance system that provides a course similar to a localizer, but generally with:

  • Less precision and/or different performance than a full localizer, and

  • Often an approach course that may be offset from the runway centerline


What it is:

  • A localizer-like course you can track with CDI/HSI indications

  • Typically used to support approach procedures at airports that don’t have a full ILS/LOC installation


What it is not:

  • Not a precision approach (no true glideslope system)

  • Not guaranteed to have the same sensitivity and tight tolerances as an ILS localizer

  • Not the same as an LDA (though both can be offset and feel “localizer-ish”)


How It Flies in the Cockpit

From a pilot technique standpoint, you fly an SDF a lot like a localizer-only approach:

  • Lateral guidance only

  • Descent managed via step-down fixes or a constant descent technique (if appropriate/allowed)

  • Usually flown to an MDA, not a DA


Expect “localizer-like” sensitivity—just not identical

SDF provides course guidance that’s generally tighter than a VOR approach, but it may not have the same “needle behavior” you’re used to on an ILS/LOC. You should still plan for:

  • Small heading corrections

  • No needle chasing inside the FAF

  • Staying ahead of configuration changes


Why SDF Approaches Exist

SDF approaches were created to provide a relatively accurate, runway-oriented course without the infrastructure or cost of a full ILS/LOC system. They can be especially useful where:

  • Terrain or obstacles make other installations difficult

  • A full ILS isn’t justified operationally

  • Airports need an additional non-RNAV option for resilience


Today, RNAV (GPS) has replaced many of them, but SDF is still out there—especially in legacy approach networks.


Offset Courses: The Big Briefing Item

Many SDF approaches are not perfectly aligned with the runway. That means:

  • You may break out with the runway not centered ahead of you

  • A stable landing may require a visual alignment maneuver near minimums

  • The “temptation” is to correct aggressively late—don’t


Pilot takeaway: If you can’t achieve stable alignment by your normal stabilized approach gates, go missed. Being “almost lined up” at 300–400 feet AGL in IMC-to-VMC transition is not a plan.


No Glideslope: Don’t Let the Lateral Precision Fool You

This is the most common error mindset with SDF:

  • “The lateral guidance looks precise, so I’ll treat it like an ILS.”


But SDF approaches are still nonprecision vertically. That means:

  • Step-down fixes matter

  • MDA rules matter

  • Timing or distance-to-descend planning matters

  • Your descent profile discipline matters


If your avionics displays an advisory glidepath (“+V”), remember: it’s advisory unless the approach is published and authorized for approved vertical guidance.


Autopilot and Avionics Considerations

Depending on the aircraft:

  • You may be able to couple the autopilot laterally (like tracking a localizer)

  • Vertical guidance will still be your job unless you have a separate approved vertical mode


Pilot habit that helps: Treat SDF like a LOC approach: configure early, couple lateral if appropriate, and manage descent with a planned profile that respects all step-downs.


Practical Tips for Flying an SDF Well

  1. Brief course alignment

  2. Compare final approach course to runway heading.

  3. Decide whether it’s a true straight-in or effectively an offset approach requiring visual alignment.

  4. Plan the vertical profile

  5. Identify step-down fixes and altitude constraints.

  6. Use a constant descent technique when appropriate (but don’t bust step-downs).

  7. Keep corrections small on final

  8. Especially inside the FAF: small heading changes, wait for the needle to respond.

  9. Be strict about stabilized criteria

  10. If you break out and the runway is off to the side, don’t “dive and yank.”

  11. If alignment isn’t happening smoothly, execute the missed approach.

  12. Know the missed approach cold

  13. Offset final courses can make missed approach protection and headings especially important.


Bottom Line

An SDF approach gives you localizer-like lateral guidance but remains non precision in the vertical dimension. The two biggest pilot priorities are:

  • Don’t treat it like an ILS just because the needle looks good, and

  • Brief and respect any offset alignment, with a willingness to go missed if the visual transition isn’t stable.



Study Full Aviation Courses:

wifiCFI's full suite of aviation courses has everything you need to go from brand new to flight instructor and airline pilot! Check out any of the courses below for free:


Study Courses:


Checkride Lesson Plans:


Teaching Courses:



 
 
bottom of page